I apologise if this blog is a little longer than usual but there is so much documentation to hand which has been collated to eke out the truth in what has been a disgraceful display of abuse at the highest level of government. This blog is intended to give an insight into the events leading up to and after the suspension and although lengthy there is still more which could have been included.
Nothing can be done to undo the hurt inflicted on the former police chief
and his family or to recover the million pounds plus incurred by Home Affairs
and the States in paying for futile court cases and pointless one sided
investigations whilst attempting to justify an unjust act. However those
involved with the decision to suspend in the first place and those who did
their utmost to cover up the truth and to deny the Chief Officer his natural right
to answer the spurious allegation against him should not be forgotten.
The police investigation into the child abuse allegations came as a rude
awakening to many Islanders who smugly believed that Jersey was
immune from such claims. It is not disputed that the decision to implement
Operation Rectangle was only taken after all the available evidence had been
examined and was supported by senior officers from outside the Island . Given
the weight of the information to hand, not to conduct a thorough search of Haut
de Garenne would certainly have led to claims of cover ups. The police would be
damned if they did not dig and certainly damned because they did, particularly
as no bodies were found, although no explanation has been given for the
collection of teeth that were found.
In recent months the Portuguese Police conducted a similar dig in the
full glare of the world’s media for Madeleine McCann which apparently did not discover any
evidence but I have not heard of the relevant police chief being suspended.
What is evident is that it was the leadership of Jersey’ s senior politicians
that was found wanting and having had their shortcomings publicly exposed some
one’s head had to roll and it certainly was not going to be theirs.
I was a States Member at the time of the suspension which came as a
complete surprise. I had been aware of concerns regarding the expense of the
investigations but not of the professionalism of the police involved. I was
surprised how quickly a Church Service was arranged for the victims when none
had been identified. However the service was not at the behest of the police. I
was also surprised at how quickly the investigation attracted the attention of
the world’s media. However once in contact with several journalists it soon
became evident that the principle of why let the truth get in the way of a good
story prevailed. I was a serving police officer in Lambeth during the Brixton
riots and there were times when I questioned the motives and integrity of the
media who similarly sought to make mountains out of molehills.
The police chief was suspended on 12th November 2008 but
because of the election the matter via a Minister’s statement could not be addressed until 2nd December. The Minister Andrew Lewis said it gave him no
pleasure to read it. Given the evidence of Ministerial and Civil Servant
collusion that later came to light it is not surprising it gave him no pleasure.
During the next three years there were well over a hundred written and
oral questions asked by the likes of, Deputies Higgins, Tadier, Pitman,
Wimberley and me as we sought answers from Ian Le Marquand, Terry Le Sueur and
Philip Ozouf. Connetable Crowcroft in December 2008 lodged a proposition P182/2008 HERE requesting the Home Affairs Minister Ian Le Marquand to commission
a compliance check on the suspension and report to the States no later than 1st
March 2009.
It seemed such an obvious yet simple request, particularly as
Ian Le Marquand was new to the States and should have stood back and given his
support. Unfortunately it was not to be possibly because he had been briefed by his acting Chief Officer David Warcup who was heavily involved and
conflicted as he would have taken his boss's job and salary. His participation in the suspension not only led to criticism
from Bryan Napier but rendered him unfit to replace Graham Power. He
resigned prior to seeking States approval for his appointment.
Having failed to accept Connetable Crowcroft’s proposition in
2010 I lodged P9/2010. HERE which sought approval to establish an independent panel
to review the suspension. Again the States rejected that proposition but
accepted Chief Minister Le Sueur’s proposal to appoint an independent commissioner
to conduct an “in house Review.”
Senator Le Sueur sought my support but I would only give it if I was to
be party to the appointment of the Commissioner and able to have sight of the
draft report(s), this was agreed as were were the terms of reference. However they
were altered by the Deputy Chief Executive Officer without consulting me or Senator Le Sueur. It is known that at least two drafts were
produced without me having sight of them as was the “final” version which I
don’t believe was as written by the Commissioner Bryan Napier. His Report can be read HERE. Whilst Napier found people at fault it is
difficult to understand how he could find no evidence of a conspiracy when his
report provides so much evidence.
One person not interviewed was Wendy Kinnard who was the Minister for Home Affairs until mid October 2008. She would never have been party to disciplinary action therefore she was never party to any of the secret discussions which took place between Senator Frank Walker, Andrew Lewis who was Assistant Minister of Home Affairs, Chief Executive Officer Bill
Ogley, David Warcup and the Law Officers so how could it be said there was no
evidence of conspiracy?
During the in camera question period after
Andrew Lewis had read his statement and before I was privy to any of the facts
that later emerged, I said there was a nasty smell about the suspension. Knowing
what I now know it is evident that Graham Power was “stitched up.” Deputy Lewis had replaced Wendy Kinnard and like Kinnard and Walker he too was retiring from the States in early December. Therefore having been given a window of opportunity it called for swift action. The action taken was akin to "planting" which was a despicable act undertaken by "bent coppers" and did so much harm to the reputation of all police officers.
It was known that Graham Power was to take a short break over the week end of 7/10th November. It is evident that David Warcup had a "friend" in the Met Police who was attempting to obtain a report into the Jersey Police Force's handling of the child abuse allegation. The Report was never intended for disciplinary action and neither was it complete because important witnesses had not been interviewed. It is also evident that the "friend" could not provide the report until Monday 10th November. However letters relating to the pending suspension were typed on the morning of Saturday 8th November which made reference to the Met Interim Report which was still not in Warcup's hands. The letters were dated 12th November which was the day that Graham Power was to be suspended
The Interim Report without the Met Police logo was received by Warcup during Monday 10th and was deemed to be so sensitive that they were for police eyes only, therefore it was not seen by Lewis, Walker or Ogley, Yet this was the damning evidence which used to justify suspending a police officer with over 40 years distinguished service.
There is no longer any dispute about the drafting of the letters because having had his request for evidence to support that fact denied by the Chief Minister, Senator Terry Le Sueur, Graham Power made a successful application to the States Complaint's Board which found in his favour. The Board's finding via R115/2009 can be read HERE
The suspension was deemed to be a neutral act which was farcical claim because despite the evidence that came to hand the matter was allowed to simmer for almost two years at the cost of over a million pounds much of which was paid to the Wiltshire Constabulary whose officers made dozens of trips to Jersey trying to find evidence to level disciplinary charges. Although their report was submitted to Minister Le Marquand before Christmas it remained on his desk until Graham Power had retired the following summer.
Bryan Napier presented his final Report on 10th September but Senator Le Sueur would not circulate it. He was minded to take disciplinary proceedings against the Chief Executive Officer Bill Ogley, but no doubt was advised not do so being fearful of what Bill Ogley would have made public. Somehow a way out was found whereby he was able to retire with a £500k parachute. The Napier Report was eventually published two months later but only after I had made it clear that I would publish my copy.
It was known that Graham Power was to take a short break over the week end of 7/10th November. It is evident that David Warcup had a "friend" in the Met Police who was attempting to obtain a report into the Jersey Police Force's handling of the child abuse allegation. The Report was never intended for disciplinary action and neither was it complete because important witnesses had not been interviewed. It is also evident that the "friend" could not provide the report until Monday 10th November. However letters relating to the pending suspension were typed on the morning of Saturday 8th November which made reference to the Met Interim Report which was still not in Warcup's hands. The letters were dated 12th November which was the day that Graham Power was to be suspended
The Interim Report without the Met Police logo was received by Warcup during Monday 10th and was deemed to be so sensitive that they were for police eyes only, therefore it was not seen by Lewis, Walker or Ogley, Yet this was the damning evidence which used to justify suspending a police officer with over 40 years distinguished service.
There is no longer any dispute about the drafting of the letters because having had his request for evidence to support that fact denied by the Chief Minister, Senator Terry Le Sueur, Graham Power made a successful application to the States Complaint's Board which found in his favour. The Board's finding via R115/2009 can be read HERE
The suspension was deemed to be a neutral act which was farcical claim because despite the evidence that came to hand the matter was allowed to simmer for almost two years at the cost of over a million pounds much of which was paid to the Wiltshire Constabulary whose officers made dozens of trips to Jersey trying to find evidence to level disciplinary charges. Although their report was submitted to Minister Le Marquand before Christmas it remained on his desk until Graham Power had retired the following summer.
Bryan Napier presented his final Report on 10th September but Senator Le Sueur would not circulate it. He was minded to take disciplinary proceedings against the Chief Executive Officer Bill Ogley, but no doubt was advised not do so being fearful of what Bill Ogley would have made public. Somehow a way out was found whereby he was able to retire with a £500k parachute. The Napier Report was eventually published two months later but only after I had made it clear that I would publish my copy.
Napier made a number of recommendations such as to ensure that statements
are preserved and not torn up as was the case with Bill Ogley. Therefore I
lodged a proposition P166/2010 HERE which sought States approval to implement
them. Also as Napier had found that Graham Power had been unfairly suspended I asked
that he be given a formal States apology.
As with other propositions P166 was rejected and disgracefully the
States rejected my proposal to apologize to Graham Power. In March 2011 after
the former Senator Le Gresley had lodged P19/2011 requesting the Council of
Ministers to reconsider its decision not to establish a Committee of Inquiry into Jersey’s historic abuse, I lodged amendments HERE seeking States approval to
establish a Committee of Inquiry if the issues raised in R27/2008 HERE had not been
not been resolved.
It is said that everything comes to he who waits and thanks to a U turn
by some hard liners my amendment along with one from Deputy Tadier was
approved. Paragraph 12 of the Committee of Inquiry’s terms of Reference is to determine
whether the concerns in 2007 were sufficient to justify the States of Jersey
Police setting in train ‘Operation Rectangle’. Not only must the concerns be
reviewed but also the repercussions of that decision.
The suspension
was totally unjustified as was the cost incurred in to prevent the truth being
disclosed. The Committee of Inquiry now has the opportunity of right a
wrong. The Inquiry
Chair, Frances Oldham QC, has promised a "robust and fearless"
examination of what went wrong and to find answers for people who suffered
abuse as children. In seeking answers to those issues she must also seek
answers from those who abused their positions when suspending Graham Power
because without his leadership there would be no investigation, no Committee of Inquiry and those abused and neglected would still be unheard.
P182/2008 Connetable Simon Crowcroft's request for a compliance check can be read HERE
R115/2009 The Complaint's Board Finding re date of drafting of suspension letters can be read HERE
P 9/2010 My proposition to request an independent public review of the suspension can be read HERE
R.132/2010 The Napier Report can be read HERE
P166/2008 which also contains Graham Power's Affidavit can be read HERE
P19/2011 amendment to establish Committee of Inquiry can be read HERE
R27/2008 Council of Ministers Report re possible of Inquiry can be read HERE
P182/2008 Connetable Simon Crowcroft's request for a compliance check can be read HERE
R115/2009 The Complaint's Board Finding re date of drafting of suspension letters can be read HERE
P 9/2010 My proposition to request an independent public review of the suspension can be read HERE
R.132/2010 The Napier Report can be read HERE
P166/2008 which also contains Graham Power's Affidavit can be read HERE
P19/2011 amendment to establish Committee of Inquiry can be read HERE
R27/2008 Council of Ministers Report re possible of Inquiry can be read HERE
