There is a view that the Terms of Reference were too narrow and that Dame Heather a former colleague of Senator Bailhache was conflicted. Senator Bailhache who apart from being a former Bailiff was also a Judge and has been one of the Dean's staunchest supporters.
Prior to Dame Heather beginning her investigation it had been agreed by John Gladwin the former Bishop of Chelmsford who had been appointed to head the overall Visitation that HG would receive some tangible support and all communications in relation to the Visitation would be directed through me, thus preventing HG further distress. Dame Heather claims not to have been aware of that arrangement. The failure to abide with that arrangement is unforgivable and unprofessional because it has led to HG suffering extreme trauma and understandably complete loss of faith in the Church of England.
Dame Heather has refused to interview HG but last October she did eventually interview me, however before the interview it had been agreed that I would receive a copy of the transcript. Following the interview Dame Heather made a number of excuses to avoid providing me with a copy. However she has since refused point blank to provide me with a copy and we both know why. The reason being that Dame Heather knows that she made a number of unprofessional remarks about HG.
For the past few months I have been emailing the Bishop of Winchester and copying them to a number of interested parties such as the Bailiff, Chief Minister Gorst, John Gladwin and members of the Safeguarding panel. I have been asking for a copy of the transcript and what promised tangible support for HG was being considered. I have also made it clear that there was no way that the Steel Report can be published because HG has not been interviewed and of Dame Heather's unprofessional comments which can be found in the transcript.
Needless to say, my emails have been ignored, however I continue to send them. Last week I heard that Dame Heather was apparently giving her Report to Bishop Dakin and also questions relating to the report were being asked at this week's States Sitting. I was also aware of HG's serious concerns as to what the report might say about her. Therefore in my latest email which I sent on our Liberation Day last Friday I asked what provision was being made to assist HG who was likely to be further traumatised when the report is published.
My email is below
"Dear Bishop Tim,
With reference
to my previous emails requesting the transcript of my meeting with Dame Heather
and for tangible assistance for HG. As yet I still wait a reply let alone
action.
I have heard
that there is movement regarding the Steel Report and I write to ask what
action you are proposing to take to assist HG who may well be further
traumatised by its contents. You know that she has not only been deeply
affected by the arrest and deportation from Jersey at the behest of the Dean,
his wife and the former Bishop, but also from the ramifications of your
decision to commission Jan Korris to investigate the matter and the events that
have followed. I include the promises made by Jo hn Gladwin and
Christine Daly but have been broken.
69 years ago
today Jersey was liberated from the German Occupation and on that day I
went with my father to what was the Weighbridge to meet the British
troops. Today is a Bank Holiday and there will be the usual Special States
Sitting where our Chief Minister Senator Gorst will be giving the Address.
Afterwards there will be the usual re-enactment in which the
Dean will play a prominent role and no doubt will be speaking about
freedom and justice. All or most of the Island 's clergy will
also be in attendance.
I will not be
attending the event and I know that my absence will not be noticed but I feel I
cannot be in the presence of people who proclaim to be Christian but do not
practice what they preach, have not lifted a finger nor have voiced any concern
about HG's welfare.
Whilst you were not party to HG's arrest etc you are in a position
to right a great wrong. I know that you too have become a victim of the
consequences of your decision to commission the Korris review however it is in
your gift to right the wrong inflicted on HG and in light of the Archbishop's
recent Radio Jersey interview, I await with interest
of the action you are proposing to take."
I have not received a reply, however this morning on the Channel TV website the following can be found.
" A
report into the way abuse allegations are dealt with by Jersey 's church is being
delayed so that its impact on an alleged victim can be properly considered.
ITV News has learned the Bishop of Winchester is seeking advice on the best way to publish it without causing the woman harm.
He's set up an "Impact Assessment Group" to suggest ways the report by Dame Heather Steel can be made public.
She's been investigating howJersey 's church looks after
vulnerable parishioners.
We can today (Wednesday) reveal the Bishop of Winchester, Tim Dakin, has formally informedJersey 's Lieutenant Governor that he will not be
taking any disciplinary action against the Dean of Jersey who was originally
suspended from office when details emerged of the way he handled an allegation
of abuse involving a parishioner.
Bob Key was subsequently reinstated.
ITV News understands the Lieutenant Governor has been told by Bishop Dakin that he is unable to give a specific timetable for when the report will be out but it should be within the next few weeks."
I have no reason to doubt the website's contents, therefore if that is the case I really question why Bishop Dakin has set up an "Impact Assessment Group" when he and fellow clergy have not lifted a finger to assist HG or allow her to formally give her side of events. I also question whether Dame Heather has been investigating how Jersey's Church looks after vulnerable parishioners.
If an "Impact Assessment Group" has been set up, is it because of my suggestion, if so why have I not been informed and more importantly why is HG not party to the proposal? Also does anyone really believe that Dame Heather has been investigating how Jersey Church's have been looking after their vulnerable parishioners. It is not within her TOR. Also this is a lady who has refused to interview HG or investigate HG's arrest and deportation, has made derogatory remarks about her and has refused to deliver a promised transcript which would confirm Dame Heather's bias.
One has to ask what new game is Winchester playing as it stumbles from one disaster to another. The Report is as meaningless as the apologies given to HG by the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Bishop of Winchester and Jersey's Dean, Bob Key.
Dame Heather's TOR in respect of what happens to her Report are as follows;
10. The Investigator shall deliver a copy of the report to the Bishop ofWinchester . Upon
receipt the Bishop of Winchester will supply a copy of the report to anyone against whom disciplinary action is
recommended and to the Bailiff of Jersey ,
the Dean of Jersey and the Ministry of Justice.
ITV News has learned the Bishop of Winchester is seeking advice on the best way to publish it without causing the woman harm.
He's set up an "Impact Assessment Group" to suggest ways the report by Dame Heather Steel can be made public.
She's been investigating how
We can today (Wednesday) reveal the Bishop of Winchester, Tim Dakin, has formally informed
Bob Key was subsequently reinstated.
ITV News understands the Lieutenant Governor has been told by Bishop Dakin that he is unable to give a specific timetable for when the report will be out but it should be within the next few weeks."
I have no reason to doubt the website's contents, therefore if that is the case I really question why Bishop Dakin has set up an "Impact Assessment Group" when he and fellow clergy have not lifted a finger to assist HG or allow her to formally give her side of events. I also question whether Dame Heather has been investigating how Jersey's Church looks after vulnerable parishioners.
If an "Impact Assessment Group" has been set up, is it because of my suggestion, if so why have I not been informed and more importantly why is HG not party to the proposal? Also does anyone really believe that Dame Heather has been investigating how Jersey Church's have been looking after their vulnerable parishioners. It is not within her TOR. Also this is a lady who has refused to interview HG or investigate HG's arrest and deportation, has made derogatory remarks about her and has refused to deliver a promised transcript which would confirm Dame Heather's bias.
One has to ask what new game is Winchester playing as it stumbles from one disaster to another. The Report is as meaningless as the apologies given to HG by the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Bishop of Winchester and Jersey's Dean, Bob Key.
Dame Heather's TOR in respect of what happens to her Report are as follows;
10. The Investigator shall deliver a copy of the report to the Bishop of
11. The Bishop of Winchester
shall, within a reasonable period of time, notify anyone against whom disciplinary action is recommended whether disciplinary action will be taken and the complaints which
will be considered.
12. The Bishop of Winchester shall provide a copy of the report of the Investigation to the Commissary of the Visitation of the Parishes of the Deanery of Jersey, Bishop John Gladwin. The report of the Investigation may be used to inform the findings of the Visitation.
13. The report of the investigation or a summary of its findings and conclusions will be published in due course, and / or after the conclusion of any recommended disciplinary proceedings. Where necessary the report may be summarised and / or redacted for legal reasons or to protect the identity of any person who features in the report or who has provided relevant information to the investigation.
As one can see the TOR allows for the Bishop to summarise and redact the report as he wishes and I am sure that there will be major redactions. No disciplinary action is being taken against the Dean, Winchester has now split from Jersey, I am not going to receive the transcript and whole sorry affair has been a night mare for HG and will continue to be as long as the Report exists. The best thing the Bishop can do is to bin the report because no good can come from it not only because of the harm already inflicted but because it will only bring further ridicule and discredit on all those involved in what has become a disaster for the Church of England hierarchy.