During Question Time at last Tuesday’s States sitting Deputy John Le Fondre asked Chief Minister Senator Gorst if he was able to update
Members as to when the Steel Report would be released? The Chief Minister could
not give a date but stated that he was greatly disappointed that the matter had
not been brought to a swift conclusion.
Followers of my Dean Blogs will know that 2 years ago Dame
Heather Steel was commissioned by Bishop
Dakin to review the Dean’s handling of a complaint made by a young lady against
a Church Warden in 2008.
Bruce Willing is a member of a small group of people which
includes Senator Philip Bailhache who have been vociferously critical of Bishop Dakin’s handling of the “Dean Affair” and have been unstinting in their support
for the Dean. I don’t have a problem with their stance but they seem oblivious
of some of the Dean’s shortcomings and of the resultant wedge that has now been
securely lodged between Winchester
and Jersey thus ending our 500 year old link.
Two years ago I published this BLOG which is well worth reading
because it contains a letter from a Dean supporter and a set of questions posed
by Bruce Willing. It also contains a quote from the Dean when apologising for
mistakes made in his handling of the complaint in which he states “If Christians can’t put things like this
behind them and move on then we are all in a mess.”
Given the
impasse it is evident that some Christians have not put things behind them or
moved on. Not only do they want the Bishop’s blood but also his head. It is
also now evident that following Bruce Willing’s concerns regarding the initial
Terms of Reference (TOR) they were amended. This possibly accounts for why the Korris
recommendation that the arrest and deportation of HG from Jersey be investigated was omitted from the final TOR.
It should also
be recalled that Korris was heavily criticised for not interviewing the
complainant, however neither has Steel yet the same criticism is not being
levelled at her. After my 3 hour meeting with Dame Heather Steel in
October 2013 I wrote to Bishop Dakin informing him of my concerns regarding Dame Heather’s partiality and later published a blog on the matter which can be
read by clicking.HERE
Now that it is
evident that the TOR were amended and the author's partiality questionable its not surprising that some people are keen
for the Steel Report to be published.
The broadcast may be heard by clicking HERE Readers will note that there are disagreements between Bruce Willing and me. I don't have a problem with what I said but I disagree with some of Bruce's comments which I am pretty sure would also be refuted by Bishop Dakin who was certainly at the sharp end of Bruce's tongue
It is interesting that the issue of the Dean's "exoneration" was again raised. In my book the fact that disciplinary action is not being taken does not mean that one is exonerated. What is evident is that mistakes have been made on both sides and no good will come by the publication of a Report which is already discredited and will do more harm than good.
I believe the public and the Church would be better served if both parties acted as Christians, put things behind them and moved on so everyone gets out of the mess that they have created.
If readers have difficulty in opening the links to my two blogs above should be able to access them by clicking HERE and HERE
I am grateful to Radio Jersey for providing the link to yesterday's broadcast which can also be accessed by clicking HERE
I wish this wasn't so confusing but as always the authorities like it like that so they can muddy water to suit their agenda. You are a resilient man in the face of such hostility.
ReplyDeleteI was shocked to hear Bruce Willing's self righteous garbage. How can he claim to be a Christian?
ReplyDeleteGood work Bob. Usual stitch up
ReplyDeleteBob, I agree with you about the Dean not being exonerated and I don't know how Bruce Willing can infer that Steel has said that. If Steel was of that view she would have made that clear. However she said that no disciplinary action is being taken which implies that the Dean had made mistakes, but not serious enough to take disciplinary action.
ReplyDeleteFor Willing to claim that the Dean has done no wrong is nonsense.
I must take issue with Mr Willing’s claim that the Dean has done nothing wrong. He seems to have ignored the fact that when the Dean was reinstated he added his apologies to those of the Archbishop and Bishop to HG and said he regretted the mistakes he made and upon reflection it would have been more helpful if he had c0-operated more fully with the Korris Report.
ReplyDeleteGet your facts right Mr Willing.
Yes, it does seem that Bruce has a short memory.
DeleteMore like a Willing Blind Spot
DeleteReady Willing but unable if you ask me.
DeleteBob.
ReplyDeleteMario Lundy and Stuart Syvret at JERSEY CHILD ABUSE INQUIRY.