Monday 15 September 2014

Jersey's Dean---Steel and Gladwin Reports---Update

It is now 18 months since Tim Dakin the Bishop of Winchester suspended Jersey's Dean Bob Key and announced that there would be an investigation into the Dean’s handling of a complaint against a Church Warden.

The suspension arose from the findings of report by Jan Korris who had in November 2011 been commissioned by the Safeguarding Panel for the Diocese of Winchester. What has never been established is why the Korris review was instigated in the first place? However is should be noted that Tim Dakin was not appointed Bishop until April 2012 so was unlikely to have played any part in that decision.

The Korris Report is dated March 2013 but must have been viewed by Bishop Dakin some time sooner because on 8th March he announced that he had suspended Jersey’s Dean.

At the time of the suspension Bishop Dakin said “Firstly I want to give my unreserved apologies to the complainant for her treatment. Protecting the vulnerable is at the heart of the Church of England's mission. With that comes a duty to ensure those in need are properly looked after. It is vital that robust safeguarding policies are in place and, above all, that they are properly implemented."

“This Independent Report suggests that, put simply our policies were not implemented as they should have been. I am particularly disappointed that the Dean of Jersey refused to cooperate with the review and I have now ordered an immediate and thorough investigation. In the wake of the report, difficult but necessary and decisive actions are required to ensure that, in the future, procedures will be followed properly.”

18 months on it is worth looking to see if there is an outcome of the “difficult but necessary and decisive actions.” On 26th March last year it was announced that John Gladwin the former Bishop of Chelmsford would head a Visitation/Inquiry whereby woolly Terms of Reference were published. This eventually led to the Inquiry being separated with John Gladwin looking into the complicated Constitutional issues and Dame Heather Steel being appointed to investigate the Dean’s handling of the complaint against the Church Warden.

It goes without saying that Bishop Dakin soon sailed into troubled and uncharted waters and was quite unaware of “The Jersey Way” of handling matters particularly if it affected establishment figures or constitutional matters. Soon after the former Bailiff but now Senator Bailhache wrote to the Archbishop of Canterbury protesting at the Bishop’s handling of the matter whereby the Dean’s suspension was lifted.

The process had all the hallmarks of a “done deal” because the Dean offered a meaningless apology for failings in his administration. I may add that the Archbishop of Canterbury had also offered public but not personal apologies to the victim.

Given the importance of the matter let alone the obscene cost one would have hoped that by mid September 2014 the Gladwin and Steel Reports would have been published. It is worth reminding readers that last November Bishop Gladwin announced that Dame Heather was finalising her Report but based on her findings no disciplinary action was being taken against the Dean and the other clergy member.

I have always maintained that the Steel Report would be worthless for a number of reasons, such as she did not interview the two main witnesses, she did not, as recommended by Jan Korris address the issue of the complainant’s deportation from Jersey and being left destitute in the UK. Dame Heather is a former colleague of Senator Philip Bailhache a well known supporter of the Dean and in a 3 hour meeting with me she was less than complimentary to the victim and displayed a bias in favour of the Dean. It should be noted that Dame Heather reneged on a promise to provide me with the transcript of the meeting.

In May this year the Bishop informed Jersey’s Bailiff that Dame Heather had sent him her Report and that she had informed him that it was her final report. One gets the impression that Dame Heather had submitted a number of “final” reports and had got fed up with continually making amendments at the Bishop’s behest.

The Bishop made some further but very relevant points in that he was forwarding the Report to Counsel in London to look at defamation and confidentiality but hoped to publish the Report shortly. He had also assembled a small group of suitably qualified professionals to carry out an Impact Assessment to consider the likely impact on the person at the heart of the matter.

The Bishop went on to say that the Report highlighted a number of significant concerns about safeguarding in Jersey, including some which were directly connected with the Canons and the laws of Jersey.

We are now in mid September and one is perfectly entitled to know what is going on at Winchester and ask why the Reports have not been published and what if any steps have been taken in relation to the Impact Study and addressing the significant safeguarding concerns in the Island which were also raised by Jan Korris in March 2013.

I have tried to get answers from Winchester and Canterbury but needless to say I have not received replies. If 18 months ago Bishop Tim was of the view that it was vital that robust safeguarding policies are in place and, above all, that they are properly implemented it would be helpful if he, the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Bishop of Dover who now has oversight for Jersey or the Dean would make it publicly known what new safe guarding policies are in place and that when someone makes a complaint against a Church Official they wont end up being deported and left destitute in the UK.

At the same time it would also be helpful for the Bishop to announce that he will not be publishing the Steel Report as it has been so redacted it is now as meaningless as his apologies.

Today the Dean has announced that the Church is to seek the views of Islanders in relation to same sex marriages. It makes one wonder where the Church’s priorities are.

15 comments:

  1. Bob.

    "Bishop Gladwin announced that Dame Heather was finalising her Report but based on her findings no disciplinary action was being taken against the Dean and the other clergy member."

    Or in the world of ITV/CTV/Philip Bailhache, and contrary to the English language/dictionary "EXONERATED."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the link, I remember it well and well worth readers reading it.

      Delete
  2. The conflicted Dame Heather Steel should not be published because she is a friend of Bailhache and the Korris report has been taken offline. Keep up the good work against the evil Dean and Bailhache you and HG make a good team.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dame Heather Steel should be asked questions regarding her involvement. Such as did she feel she was conflicted knowing Phillip Bailhache a close friend of the Dean and a someone who using States headed paper had involved himself in communication with the bishop trying to protect the Dean.

    Further more, all formal meetings should be minuted or recorded so a true record is kept. This stops either side exagerating or forgetting what was said. As a professional person why was this everyday procedure not followed after she told you that you would receive a copy. Why has this so called report not been made public and why did she not interview all the players leading or not.

    There must be someone above her who could deal with these and other questions if she prefers not to. What a shambles.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can assure you that prior to the meeting it was agreed that the meeting would be taped and I would be given a copy of the transcript. I suggested that Dame Heather should bring a friend which she did and he was a fellow judge who changed the tapes.

      I offered to get the tapes transcribed but as the tapes belonged to the Chambers Dame Heather felt responsible for them but assured me that I would receive a copy of the transcript. As I did not I made repeated requests to Dame Heather and Bishop Dakin for the transcript but have not received a copy but because of what it contains there is no way it will be made available.

      I have tried via data protection and Freedom of Information but the laws do not allow for the release as the church is outside its remit.

      Delete
  4. So, basically, what we can take from this, is the words of assurance from the Dame and the Bishop are not to be relied upon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes and I have a number of emails as proof.

      Delete
    2. It looks as though the Church and the Judiciary have got everything stitched up. What a farce..

      Delete
  5. On the topic of "same sex marriages", how many church members are there these days, are they truely represental of the overall public!? or are they now a small minority. What about other religious faiths, are they being asked!

    If its okay to help get a vunerable person who made a claim of abuse, to be deported, by some of those who are church members how can they be relied upon for advice in other matters!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am afraid that some members of the Church of England have lost their way and are out of touch with an ever changing world.

      Delete
  6. Bob. A new post on the Jersey Senatorial election. http://notthestatemedia.blogspot.com/2014/09/jersey-senatorial-election-three-tier.html

    ReplyDelete
  7. I heard you on the radio this morning Bob and wanted to say god bless you for challenging the church in the way it has treated HG. Bob Key should be kicked out of Jersey as well as the States for what he did to HG. Having her arrested and imprisoned for reporting how she was abused and then to have her deported left destitute and penniless in the UK is simply inhumane and barbaric. You are a brave and honourable man Mr Hill for defending the weak, the vulnerable, and the abused against the very people who should be doing it i.e. Bob Key and the church. And god bless HG also.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for comments I don't think doing what needs to be done is being brave but its sad when so many people better placed are not prepared to challenge something which is clearly unjust.

      Delete
    2. I received a comment at 1055 today. I have tried to post it but there is technical problems which is preventing me publishing it. If the reader wants me to publish it please could you re-submit it.

      Delete